Reconstruction Error of Calibration Volume’s Coordinates for 3D Swimming Kinematics

 Article (PDF) 
Pedro Figueiredo, Leandro Machado, Joao Paulo Vilas-Boas, Ricardo J. Fernandes

The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and reliability of above and underwater 3D reconstruction of three calibration volumes with different control points disposal (#1 – on vertical and horizontal rods; #2 – on vertical and horizontal rods and facets; #3 – on crossed horizontal rods). Each calibration volume (3 x 2 x 3 m) was positioned in a 25 m swimming pool (half above and half below the water surface) and recorded with four underwater and two above water synchronised cameras (50 Hz). Reconstruction accuracy was determined calculating the RMS error of twelve validation points. The standard deviation across all digitisation of the same marker was used for assessing the reliability estimation. Comparison among different number of control points showed that the set of 24 points produced the most accurate results. The volume #2 presented higher accuracy (RMS errors: 5.86 and 3.59 mm for x axis, 3.45 and 3.11 mm for y axis and 4.38 and 4.00 mm for z axis, considering under and above water, respectively) and reliability (SD: underwater cameras ± [0.2; 0.6] mm; above water cameras ± [0.2; 0.3] mm) that may be considered suitable for 3D swimming kinematic analysis. Results revealed that RMS error was greater during underwater analysis, possibly due to refraction.
DOI: 10.2478/v10078-011-0037-6
Key words
accuracy, reliability, digitisation, swimming, kinematics

You may also like...