The Effect of Crank Resistance on Arm Configuration and Muscle Activation Variances in Arm Cycling Movements

 Article (PDF) 
Authors
Mariann Mravcsik, Lilla Botzheim, Norbert Zentai, Davide Piovesan, Jozsef Laczko
Abstract

Arm cycling on an ergometer is common in sports training and rehabilitation protocols. The hand movement is constrained along a circular path, and the user is working against a resistance, maintaining a cadence. Even if the desired hand trajectory is given, there is the flexibility to choose patterns of joint coordination and muscle activation, given the kinematic redundancy of the upper limb. With changing external load, motor noise and changing joint stiffness may affect the pose of the arm even though the endpoint trajectory is unchanged. The objective of this study was to examine how the crank resistance influences the variances of joint configuration and muscle activation. Fifteen healthy participants performed arm cranking on an arm-cycle ergometer both unimanually and bimanually with a cadence of 60 rpm against three crank resistances. Joint configuration was represented in a 3-dimensional joint space defined by inter-segmental joint angles, while muscle activation in a 4-dimensional “muscle activation space” defined by EMGs of 4 arm muscles. Joint configuration variance in the course of arm cranking was not affected by crank resistance, whereas muscle activation variance was proportional to the square of muscle activation. The shape of the variance time profiles for both joint configuration and muscle activation was not affected by crank resistance. Contrary to the prevailing assumption that an increased motor noise would affect the variance of auxiliary movements, the influence of noise doesn’t appear at the joint configuration level even when the system is redundant. Our results suggest the separation of kinematic- and force-control, via mechanisms that are compensating for dynamic nonlinearities. Arm cranking may be suitable when the aim is to perform training under different load conditions, preserving stable and secure control of joint movements and muscle activations.
DOI
DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2021-0053
Citation
 APA 
Mravcsik, M., Botzheim, L., Zentai, N., Piovesan, D., Laczko, J. (2021). The Effect of Crank Resistance on Arm Configuration and Muscle Activation Variances in Arm Cycling Movements. Journal of Human Kinetics, 76, 175-189. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0053
 Harvard 
Mravcsik, M., Botzheim, L., Zentai, N., Piovesan, D., and Laczko, J. (2021). The Effect of Crank Resistance on Arm Configuration and Muscle Activation Variances in Arm Cycling Movements. Journal of Human Kinetics, 76, pp.175-189. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0053
 MLA 
Mravcsik, Mariann et al. “The Effect of Crank Resistance on Arm Configuration and Muscle Activation Variances in Arm Cycling Movements.” Journal of Human Kinetics, vol. 76, 2021, pp. 175-189. doi:10.2478/hukin-2021-0053.
 Vancouver 
Mravcsik M, Botzheim L, Zentai N, Piovesan D, Laczko J. The Effect of Crank Resistance on Arm Configuration and Muscle Activation Variances in Arm Cycling Movements. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2021;76:175-189. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0053
Key words
load, joint configuration, muscle activation variance, kinematic control, force control,

You may also like...